DownsizeDC.org
June 29, 2017
How Seattle used a minimum wage increase to cut earnings $125/mo
By Jim Babka

Seattle study finds minimum wage harmful. "Social science" is also harmful. Retweet

A new study [Washington minimum wage, KUOW photo]shows bad results from the Seattle minimum wage increase. We've written a to Congress about this, while also arguing that they should stop using "social science" to engineer human behavior. If you agree, please contact Congress using our campaign against the minimum wage. The hardwired letter to Congress reads...

Repeal the minimum wage law.

You can write your own letter or simply copy & paste ours...

Less than a year after increasing its minimum wage, Seattle boosted it again from $11 to $13 (for “large” employers). Look what happened ...

1. Lower-wage jobs shrank by 6.8%
2. Hours fell by 9.4% for those who kept their jobs
3. Workers under $19/hr are earning $125 less per month than they were before! (1)

These numbers came from a study that had the active involvement of the Seattle city government.

Those who support an increased minimum wage presume that entry-level jobs should pay enough to support families and prepare for retirement. They try to create favorable social science studies to bolster their case in the hope that they can write things like, "Most... research has found that modest increases to the minimum wage have little impact on employment."(1)

One cannot help noticing the squishiness of the words in that sentence. What seems like only a "little impact" at a city, state, or national level, can be profoundly harmful to the living, breathing person who lost or did not get a job because of the minimum wage. But showing only a “little impact” seems to be the best these studies can do.

The Seattle studied showed something far worse than only a little impact, leaving minimum wage fans stunned. They will probably now attempt to undermine this particular study, but the effort is futile...

Social science studies cannot be used to justify the aggression required to enforce a minimum wage law. Here are four reasons for that...

FIRST, science requires controlled experiments. But it's impossible to conduct a controlled experiment on an entire society.(2)

SECOND, researchers never quantify how much each person either values or was pained by the scheme. Markets do this naturally using voluntary association and prices.(3)

THIRD, these kind of social science studies are full of numbers that purport to count costs and measure benefits. But these analysts always neglect to consider...
* the moral cost of oppressing individual conscience,
* the opportunity costs, where we lose the human diversity and market creativity that leads to alternatives,
* the superior performance of those alternatives, outside of the blundering bureaucracy and a political process that seems to reward failure (4)

FOURTH, policy wonks must pretend that people are statistics, simple cogs or mere data in their vast utopian scheme. But they're not. They're real living, breathing humans.(5) Access to a job and hours matter to the flesh and blood person who, as a mere statistic, lost their job.

So, expect the Seattle study to be assassinated by minimum wage supporters. They will pick apart the methodology and assail the result. Frankly, they're just validating the four points just made -- that...

"Social science" isn't really science at all!

Therefore,

* I don't want you to gloat about this study, even if you agree with it. Another will come along tomorrow, attempting to contradict it.
* I also don't want you attacking it should you dislike the results.

Instead, take action on different grounds. Let people make their own arrangements, free of political interference. That means you should block any increase in the federal minimum wage. And as my representative, I want you to introduce legislation to repeal the federal minimum wage.

(1) https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/seattles-minimum-wage-hike-may-have-gone-too-far/
(2) https://www.zeroaggressionproject.org/mental-lever/social-science-part-1/
(3) https://www.zeroaggressionproject.org/mental-lever/cost-benefit-analysis/
(4) https://www.zeroaggressionproject.org/mental-lever/how-to-evaluate-the-state/
(5) https://www.zeroaggressionproject.org/mental-lever/social-science-part-2/

-- END OF SAMPLE LETTER--

Thanks for being an ACTIVE DC Downsizer,

Jim Babka & Perry Willis
Downsize DC

Blog commenting is currently under construction. In the meantime, you can send an email if there's something you'd like to tell us.

What Can We Do For You?

We can help you downsize the federal government, if you want that. All you have to do is join. It's free! In return...

We'll give you an army.

We're recruiting a huge army of supporters to work for what you want.

We'll give you influence.

The Downsize DC Army will exert relentless, resistance-numbing pressure on Congress.

We'll make your voice heard.

We'll use our growing army to make your beliefs heard by everyone, everywhere, every day.

We'll give you winning strategies.

Ideas like our "Read the Bills Act" and the "One Subject at a Time Act" will give you the leverage to win the public debate, control Congress, and Downsize DC!

We'll give you powerful tools.

  • Your free membership includes a subscription to our free email newsletter, the Consent Chronicle, which national talk show host Jerry Hughes calls by far the best newsletter he receives.
  • You'll be able to use our Educate the Powerful SystemSM to pressure Congress. It's easy. All it takes is a few mouse clicks and keyboard strokes. You can do it in your bathrobe while you're drinking your morning coffee, or during a break at work.
  • You'll also gain access to our 16-page strategy document, "The Downsize DC Vision." You'll learn about important insights like "ignoring an axiom," and powerful strategies like "picking off the herd." One reader called this document "the unified field theory" of political change.

To gain these benefits, just enter your email address in the box below and hit Subscribe!

Subscribe to the Consent Chronicle
Enter your email address twice: